Windows server 2012 r2 datacenter virtual machine licensing free.Windows Server Licensing for Virtual Environments
Looking for:
Windows server 2012 r2 datacenter virtual machine licensing free.Cannot access shared files or folders on a drive in Windows Server 2012 or Windows Server 2012 R2 |
Windows Server R2 - Wikipedia.[SOLVED] Windows Server Datacenter VM Licensing
Windows server 2012 r2 datacenter virtual machine licensing free -
In other words, you get rights to install Windows Server Standard or previous versions in 2 VMs on this host. A single copy of WS Standard will not suffice. There are two options; do you go with the Standard or Datacenter editions of Windows Server ?
In this case there are 4 CPUs. Then we would assign 2 copies of Windows Server Datacenter on it. The maximum specification for Windows Server Hyper-V is logical processors in the host. We count CPUs, sockets, or plain old processors — pick the term you prefer.
The correct solution is to license each host for the maximum number of VOSEs that it can have for even one second. This is not one host with 3 VMs and 1 host with 1 VM. This is 2 hosts, each of which can have up to 4 VMs. In the past we would have used Enterprise edition on each host.
That has been replaced by Windows Server Standard edition, that now has all the features and scalability of the Datacenter edition. Take each host and size it for 4 VOSEs. That means we need to assign 2 copies of Windows Server Standard edition to each host.
You have two options to license each host for up to 10 VOSEs. Firstly you could license each of the hosts with 5 copies of Windows Server Standard. Each host has 2 CPUs, so each host requires 1 copy of Datacenter. There are 2 hosts so we require 2 copies of Windows Server Datacenter. You could add more hosts to this cluster and each could have unlimited VMs. As long as the hosts have 1 or 2 CPUs each, each additional host requires only 1 copy of Windows Server Datacenter to license it for unlimited installs of Windows Server for the VMs on that host.
The magic number of 10 VOSEs is a dot in the rear view mirror. We now have lots of hosts with lots of VMs flying all over the place.
Each host has 4 CPUs. Live Migration Outside the Cluster. If this is an infrequent move then you could avail of the VL 90 day mobility right to reassign a license, ensuring the the old host is sufficiently licensed for remaining VOSEs and physical CPUs. Therefore it is irrelevant in this conversation. Buying another product is just more money spent. Thank for your long awaited license information for , I think its quite positive with enterprise going out and the other changes, although the death of the SBS server is bad news for us, but as you said it was to be expected considering the focus on office etc.
We have hosting facilities for spla customers, but our on-premises clients typically are not paying for spla licenses since they have their own on-premises licenses etc. So what if we want to offer them Hyper-v replication to our hosting center? What would be possible scenarios for this? A very good question. Until then, it is pure speculation.
Very good post. I just have one question. In the 2 server scenario, with shared storage between hosts, each host still needs to be licensed to handle 10 VMs each? What happens on the 2nd server if not sufficiently licensed? Does an error message popup? Will the software refuse to run the servers until licensing is resolved?
Hyper-V is not going to stop you from running VMs. You could be running any OS in the VM. From what I can see here, Microsoft are greatly increasing the cost for companys to introduce a Virtual Cluster. For companies with 1 physical box, the licensing is cheaper, 2 boxes it is the same and 3 or more boxes increasing more expensive. In Server they would license the Operating systems and have 8 licenses. In server they would need. Has this changed with Server that you are allowed to use hosts with 1 Processor with datacenter licensing?
You should read my post again. There is nothing, no where that is legitimate, that declares that you must have 2 physical processors to run Datacenter. You just license 2 processors. You can move VMs from the left to the middle and right hosts, because they have 3 Windows Server licenses assigned 6VMs each maxi. If they only had two licenses assigned, then you would not be able to do that. I'm also assuming that there are at least 2 physical hosts.
You see, we're almost there. The 11th VM will make difference. The Windows Server licensing is cheaper when running more than 10 VMs and taking the Datacenter license.
Again, I'll demonstrate with an image, where you'll see that the requirements to run 10VMs per host must be kept. I'm assuming that during the normal workload five VMs run on each host. In case you want to move 5 VMs to any of those 2 hosts, then each of the host has to have enough assigned Windows Standard licenses. Also the requirements to cover both hosts with at least one license to match the physical CPU requirements.
A multiple standard licenses are needed to stack to match the 10 VMs which runs in the environment. Recently I was thinking that running vCenter Server Linux appliance would lower the costs of the licensing for smaller shops, but it seems that only a good planning and the exact needs is the way of calculating the costs.
You can still read that article if you want to see the steps required to deploy and configure the vCSA in your environment. There is also a datasheet and a FAQ with more details. Connect on: Facebook. Feel free to network via Twitter vladan. Regarding physical sockets there is clear statement that each physical CPU of the host have to be licensed. What does it means.
We are in Vmware virtualized how can we activate DC license. Or, This feature is only available in Hyper-V..? I seen lot of article its clearly mentioned that DC license only looking virtualization not any particulr. Then HOW?
Comments
Post a Comment